You Can Make a Difference

January 26th, 2010

Dear Supporter,

This is the beginning of the end of marijuana prohibition.

Measures to tax and regulate marijuana have emerged in California, Washington, and New Hampshire, and we can build support for these and other reform efforts by thanking the forward-thinking legislators who are working for better marijuana policies.

New polling shows that nearly half the nation believes marijuana should be legal.  Yet many legislators still shrink from opposing prohibition for fear of losing popular support. 

You and I need to show legislators that backing marijuana reform is no longer a political risk.  If enough of us speak out, we can show lawmakers that there is a groundswell of support for reform throughout the country. 

Right now, we can prove just how big our movement is by thanking legislators who are sponsoring tax and regulate legislation.

Our movement has new champions working to fix our backwards marijuana policies and open up the discourse.  Join me in sending a note of thanks to the California, Washington, and New Hampshire lawmakers who are promoting smarter marijuana policy.

Let’s send the message that voters all across the country want marijuana reform.

Sincerely,

Bill Piper
Director, Office of National Affairs
Drug Policy Alliance Network

 

Obama administration to issue new medical marijuana policy

October 19th, 2009

WASHINGTON — Federal drug agents won’t pursue pot-smoking patients or their sanctioned suppliers in states that allow medical marijuana, under new legal guidelines to be issued Monday by the Obama administration.

Two Justice Department officials described the new policy to The Associated Press, saying prosecutors will be told it is not a good use of their time to arrest people who use or provide medical marijuana in strict compliance with state law.

The guidelines to be issued by the department do, however, make it clear that agents will go after people whose marijuana distribution goes beyond what is permitted under state law or use medical marijuana as a cover for other crimes, the officials said.

The new policy is a significant departure from the Bush administration, which insisted it would continue to enforce federal anti-pot laws regardless of state codes.

Fourteen states allow some use of marijuana for medical purposes: Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

California is unique among those for the widespread presence of dispensaries — businesses that sell marijuana and even advertise their services. Colorado also has several dispensaries, and Rhode Island and New Mexico are in the process of licensing providers, according to the Marijuana Policy Project, a group that promotes the decriminalization of marijuana use.

Attorney General Eric Holder said in March that he wanted federal law enforcement officials to pursue those who violate both federal and state law, but it has not been clear how that goal would be put into practice.

A three-page memo spelling out the policy is expected to be sent Monday to federal prosecutors in the 14 states, and also to top officials at the FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration.

The memo, the officials said, emphasizes that prosecutors have wide discretion in choosing which cases to pursue, and says it is not a good use of federal manpower to prosecute those who are without a doubt in compliance with state law.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the legal guidance before it is issued.

"This is a major step forward," said Bruce Mirken, communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project. "This change in policy moves the federal government dramatically toward respecting scientific and practical reality."

At the same time, the officials said, the government will still prosecute those who use medical marijuana as a cover for other illegal activity. The memo particularly warns that some suspects may hide old-fashioned drug dealing or other crimes behind a medical marijuana business.

In particular, the memo urges prosecutors to pursue marijuana cases which involve violence, the illegal use of firearms, selling pot to minors, money laundering or involvement in other crimes.

And while the policy memo describes a change in priorities away from prosecuting medical marijuana cases, it does not rule out the possibility that the federal government could still prosecute someone whose activities are allowed under state law.

The memo, officials said, is designed to give a sense of prosecutorial priorities to U.S. attorneys in the states that allow medical marijuana. It notes that pot sales in the United States are the largest source of money for violent Mexican drug cartels, but adds that federal law enforcement agencies have limited resources.

Medical marijuana advocates have been anxious to see exactly how the administration would implement candidate Barack Obama’s repeated promises to change the policy in situations in which state laws allow the use of medical marijuana.

Soon after Obama took office, DEA agents raided four dispensaries in Los Angeles, prompting confusion about the government’s plans.

You Can Make a Difference

April 17th, 2009

"I don’t know what this says about the online audience," joked President Obama during his first virtual town hall meeting. He was dismissing an idea submitted by tens of thousands of Americans: making marijuana legal.

This week, President Obama is visiting Mexico and seeing first hand the drug war violence that is spilling over our southern border, violence you and I know is fueled by marijuana prohibition.

Now that he’s seen what’s really happening, you have the chance to tell the president it’s time for a serious discussion about the consequences of marijuana prohibition.

Tell President Obama it’s time for a serious debate about marijuana prohibition.

Thousands of people have been killed in the drug war in Mexico in the last couple of years. The drug traffickers are stockpiling machine guns and grenades and now are operating in hundreds of U.S. cities. This level of violence is the inevitable result of policies that create a lucrative black market.

You and I understand that ending marijuana prohibition would reduce violence and corruption the same way ending alcohol Prohibition did. I hope now that President Obama has seen the grisly consequences of marijuana prohibition first hand, he will no longer joke about marijuana law reform. Join me in telling him: This issue is deadly serious, and it’s time to put all options on the table.

Sincerely,

Bill Piper
Director, Office of National Affairs
Drug Policy Alliance Network

March 6th, 2009

Dear Supporter,

Thanks to you, we are gaining ground in the struggle against marijuana prohibition.

President Obama’s attorney general indicated last week that the U.S. Justice Department is going to stop wasting federal resources arresting medical marijuana patients and providers. No doubt all your phone calls and emails to the White House had a huge impact!

You can help keep up the momentum by paving the way for medical marijuana to be sold in your local pharmacy like any other medicine.

On their way out, Bush officials blocked an effort to get FDA-approved marijuana research underway. The Obama administration can overturn this decision and make it possible for the University of Massachusetts at Amherst to grow marijuana for medical research. But they must act soon.

You have a chance to make it happen today!

Your hard work is definitely making a difference, and the tide is turning in our favor: the Kellogg’s brand is in decline, after they fired Michael Phelps; California is considering a bill to legalize, tax and regulate marijuana; and the New Jersey Senate recently voted to legalize marijuana for medical use (thanks again to everyone who donated to support our New Jersey efforts)!

Thank you for all your work,

Bill Piper
Director, Office of National Affairs
Drug Policy Alliance Network

Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act Introduced Yesterday in Congress

April 20th, 2008

WASHINGTON, DC – April 18 – Congressional Representative Barney Frank (D-MA) introduced the "Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act," HR 5842, yesterday, a bill co-sponsored by Representatives Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Sam Farr (D-CA), Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), and Ron Paul (R-TX). The act would change federal policy on medical marijuana in a number of ways. Specifically, HR 5842 would reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I drug, which cannot be prescribed, to a Schedule II drug, which would recognize the medical value of marijuana and create a regulatory framework for the FDA to begin a drug approval process for marijuana. The act would also prevent interference by the federal government in any local or state run medical marijuana program.

 

Similar versions of HR 5842 have been introduced in prior Congressional terms, but have never made it out of committee. "It’s time that the federal government take this issue seriously," said Caren Woodson, Government Affairs Director with Americans for Safe Access (ASA), a nationwide medical marijuana advocacy group working with Mr. Frank and other Members of Congress to change federal policy. "By disregarding marijuana’s medical efficacy, and undermining efforts to implement state laws, the federal government is willfully placing hundreds of thousands of sick Americans in harms way." In addition to rescheduling marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), HR 5842 would provide protection from the CSA and the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) for qualified patients and caregivers in states that have legalized the use of medical marijuana. Specifically, the act prevents the CSA and FDCA from prohibiting or restricting: (1) a physician from prescribing or recommending marijuana for medical use, (2) an individual from obtaining, possessing, transporting within their state, manufacturing, or using marijuana in accordance with their state law, (3) an individual authorized under State law from obtaining, possessing, transporting within their state, or manufacturing marijuana on behalf of an authorized patient, or (4) an entity authorized under local or State law to distribute medical marijuana to authorized patients from obtaining, possessing, or distributing marijuana to such authorized patients. In December, U.S. House Judiciary Chair John Conyers stated publicly his concern about the tactics being used by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and promised oversight hearings. Since then, several California mayors have written to Conyers expressing their support for hearings, including the mayors of San Francisco, Oakland, West Hollywood, and Santa Cruz. Opposition to federal interference in state medical marijuana laws has also come from multiple city councils, members of the California Board of Equalization and the state legislature, as well as New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson. Further information:


Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act, HR 5842: http://americansforsafeaccess.org/downloads/HR5842.pdf


ASA Fact Sheet on the Escalation of Harmful DEA Tactics: http://americansforsafeaccessnow.org/downloads/dea_escalation.pdf

10 Reasons Pot Is Better Than Alcohol

February 3rd, 2008

The laws currently on the books force adults to choose alcohol instead of marijuana when they seek to relax or socialize. Given alcohol is far more harmful than marijuana, this makes no sense whatsoever. Marijuana is the safest of all drugs. It is far safer to smoke a joint than to have a beer.

  1. Alcohol is deadly; Pot is not. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, approximately 20,020 Americans die annually as the direct result of alcohol consumption. The comparable number for marijuana is zero.
  2. Pot is a lesser driving hazard than alcohol. A single glass of wine will impair your driving more than smoking a joint. And under certain test conditions, the complex way alcohol and cannabis combine to affect driving behavior suggests that someone who has taken both may drive less recklessly than a person who is simply drunk. These are the findings of a major study by British transport researchers
  3. Pot makes you calm. Alcohol makes you aggressive. People high on alcohol tend to get into arguments and fights. While, folks high on pot become calm and have little or no tendency to argue.
  4. Pot is much less addictive than alcohol, tobacco and even coffee.
  5. Pot heightens imagination and improves creativity. Marijuana makes most people more relaxed. It relieves the clutter and tension after a hard days work. It mellows you out and makes you more relaxed. It heightens the imagination and improves creativity. If you have a problem with anger, Pot is usually a good drug to reduce it.
  6. Pot does not give you hangovers. No morning after headaches, no waking up in puke.
  7. Pot has potential health benefits. For thousands of years, throughout the world, people have used marijuana to treat a variety of medical conditions. People undergoing cancer chemotherapy have found smoked marijuana to be an effective anti-nauseant. Marijuana is also smoked by thousands of AIDS patients to treat the nausea and vomiting associated with both the disease and AZT drug therapy.
  8. Pot is way cheaper than alcohol. Much, much cheaper both in direct and indirect costs.
  9. Alcohol poses much dangerous health risks than pot.
  10. Pot does not make you stupid/helpless/pass out. Researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health College found that nearly three quarters (72 percent) of all college female rape victims experienced rape while on alcohol.

And now, just to flip the argument. Ten Reasons why a beer is better than marijuana. (By Ralf Rinkle)

  1. Beer makes your mouth wet while they say marijuana does the opposite… not only promoting cavities, but making it hard to spit on foreign speaking aliens and other culture less low lifes.
  2. That pot crap is alleged to make you contract the “munchies” and want to eat lots of high calorie brownies and other things like that – unlike beer that turns you into a fat slob all by itself.
  3. Who’d you rather be like? a) Homer Simpson – a beer drinker. b) Newt Gingrich and Al Gore – both admitted [former? Ha!!] pot addicts.
  4. You ever hear of a “marijuana room brawl”? Of course not. And let me tell you, you haven’t experienced joy until you’ve sunk your knuckles into your friend’s or neighbor’s face… or sneaked up from behind and smashed a chair over her head… and, with beer – unlike that pot – it doesn’t even hurt till later. Take it from me , nothing makes you macho as beating the shit out of people… especially if they can’t fight back.
  5. Driving full of beer is a lot of fun and when you hit something like a kid or old person [which it facilitates a lot more than pot does] you like it a lot more.
  6. If all your dead-hippie-music-heroes like Terry Garcia, Janet Jopkins, Jamie Hendrickson, that dead Beagle guy Lenin [who shot himself in New York], Nick Jagger and Marie Osmond drank lots of beer instead of overdosing to death on pot they wouldn’t be as dead… though this might not be such a good thing since they probably still wouldn’t recognize good music if it jumped up and bit them on the butt.
  7. Beer drinkers give their kids the love they need – unlike you potheads who wouldn’t whomp the living crap out your little monsters with a nice heavy belt even if they did something like act like a sissy, ask you a stupid question or make noise while you’re watching a football game.
  8. Believe it or not dude, you don’t need to be a pot smoker to be hep and cool and psychogroovidelic. Just look at me… I was practically a world famous beatnik in 1953… except, thanks to my idiot brother who can’t read a subway map if it’s glued to his eyeballs, we got off in Harlem, and by the time we got out of the hospital and down to Bleeker St. the damn coffeehouse was closed. . . at least all the people holding the door shut said it was.
  9. Unlike beer factories, your average pot factory doesn’t pay its fair share of taxes. How the hell do you expect our government to afford to do things like have wars or tell us how to live and think without lots of money?
  10. Lastly, something you damn tree-hugging nature lovers seemed to overlook: Beer is at least 50% organic and natural, but who knows what poisons and potions from Hades those marijuana manufacturers use, especially since the scum don’t use those helpful government mandated ingredient labels which proves it’s probably mostly plutonium their commie buddies scooped up from Chernobyl and never even washed the atomic germs off of.

Today’s Modern “Super-weed”

January 21st, 2008

As a member of the "baby-boomer" generation, I, like at least half of my cohort, have experimented with marijuana in my youth. Many people, like me, even inhaled it and found it quite enjoyable. But, these days we are being warned that marijuana is "more dangerous" than ever, and that our youth is in grave danger because today’s weed is "up to 30 times more powerful" than weed in the 60’s and 70’s. We’re being told that we must "protect the children" and that we should join the chorus of voices pounding it into our children’s heads that "drugs are bad."

First, I reviewed some of the available "literature" about marijuana. I found that marijuana contains over 400 chemicals. That was interesting, but not really useful, as I also have discovered that a single coffee bean contains some 1,200 chemicals, while common tea contains a whopping 4,000. Clearly, this was not the real issue.

I learned, and of course remembered, that smoking marijuana caused your eyes to get bloodshot, your mouth to get dry, and your appetite to become insatiable. Could the modern super-weed make your eyes even redder, or your "cotton-mouth" 30 times as dry? Was it possible to get an even more pronounced case of the munchies? Curious minds need to know.

Being curious by nature, I knew there was only one way to get to the bottom of the issue: find out for myself. Since I’m now a balding middle-aged guy with a beer belly, I knew that getting some marijuana might be quite difficult. Kids would likely think I was a "narc" or worse yet, I might get caught. There was only one logical thing to do: go to the marijuana Mecca — Amsterdam. I knew that in Amsterdam people could walk into a "coffee shop" and buy marijuana just like any other commodity, and by gosh that’s exactly what I found. Upon arriving and checking into my hotel, I walked a few blocks and went into one of the shops. At the counter I found a menu listing various kinds of weed and hashish that were available. I told the counter person that I was interested in trying something really strong, and he recommended I try the "White Widow." I bought some and sat at a nearby table to smoke it.

The first thing I noticed was that the weed was soft and sticky and gave off an incredible smell. This was indeed much different than the weed we smoked in the past, which was dry and brown and smelled not much better than dried lawn clippings. By looks alone, I knew this weed must be "better." In the past, the weed we smoked was mostly stems and seeds with a bit of stringy vegetation attached to it, but this weed was devoid of seeds and had virtually no leaf material attached.

I put a little into a pipe and lit it. I took two or three hits then waited to see what happened. Holy smokes, this was indeed some very powerful weed! Way better than anything I had smoked in my past. Back then, the weed was so crappy, we would often glue several rolling papers together and make a "joint" the size of a cigar just to get high. No way I was going to try that trick with this weed. I sat in the coffee shop for a good hour in a state that can only be described as "totally baked."

After a short while, I left to walk about in the city and stopped in several other shops sampling the wares along the way. I spent three days in the pot capital of the world and tried many varieties of weed and hashish. The conclusion I draw from the experience was much the same as the one I drew from my first experience with smoking marijuana: no way this should be illegal.

If you find yourself getting worried about today’s weed and the "harm" in store for today’s youth, think back to the days when you were told the same. Today’s weed is more powerful, but no matter how hard I tried, I could not smoke myself unconscious. Don’t lie to your kids and don’t swallow the propaganda — find out for yourself and tell your kids the truth. The most dangerous thing about today’s super-weed is the same one we faced in our youth: getting caught.

A version of this was published in the Atlanta Journal Constitution on Dec 12, 2002. Archive link

 

Top 10 Marijuana Myths

October 1st, 2007

1. Marijuana is more harmful than tobacco – Many people think smoking marijuana is just as harmful as smoking tobacco, but this is not true for many reasons. (For example, most marijuana smokers smoke the bud, not the leaf, of the plant. The bud contains only 33% as much tar as tobacco; Not one case of lung cancer has ever been successfully linked to marijuana use; Cannabis, unlike tobacco, does not cause any narrowing of the small air passageways in the lungs.) Click here for more details.

2. Marijuana is a gateway drug – We were taught in school that people who try marijuana eventually move on to crave harder drugs, usually with the implication that marijuana is addictive and coke or crack are just the next step. In hindsight, this is absurd. The primary basis for this "gateway hypothesis" is a recent report by the Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA), claiming that marijuana users are 85 times more likely than non-marijuana users to try cocaine. This figure, using data from NIDA’s 1991 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, is close to being meaningless. It was calculated by dividing the proportion of marijuana users who have ever used cocaine (17%) by the proportion of cocaine users who have never used marijuana (.2%). The high risk-factor obtained is a product not of the fact that so many marijuana users use cocaine but that so many cocaine users used marijuana previously. It is hardly a revelation that people who use one of the least popular drugs are likely to use the more popular ones – not only marijuana, but also alcohol and tobacco cigarettes. The obvious statistic not publicized by CASA is that most marijuana users – 83 percent – never use cocaine. Indeed, for the nearly 70 million Americans who have tried marijuana, it is clearly a "terminus" rather than a "gateway" drug. Click here for a recently-released 12-year study on the subject.

3. Marijuana causes brain damage – The most celebrated study that claims to show brain damage is the rhesus monkey study of Dr. Robert Heath, done in the late 1970s. This study was reviewed by a distinguished panel of scientists sponsored by the Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences. Their results were published under the title, Marijuana and Health in 1982. Heath’s work was sharply criticized for its insufficient sample size (only four monkeys), its failure to control experimental bias, and the misidentification of normal monkey brain structure as "damaged". Actual studies of human populations of marijuana users have shown no evidence of brain damage. For example, two studies from 1977, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) showed no evidence of brain damage in heavy users of marijuana. That same year, the American Medical Association (AMA) officially came out in favor of decriminalizing marijuana. That’s not the sort of thing you’d expect if the AMA thought marijuana damaged the brain.

4. Marijuana use is increasing at an alarming rate – Reports of slight increases in marijuana use, especially among youth, are being used to convince Americans that a renewed campaign about the drug’s dangers is necessary to avert an impending epidemic. According to government surveys of the general population, marijuana use began decreasing in 1980, after more than a decade of steady increase. By 1990, the downward trend showed signs of slowing, but use-rates remained substantially lower than those recorded in the 1970s. Today 34.3% of high school seniors claim to have smoked pot in the last 12 months which is down from 52.8% in 1976, 50.9% in 1986, and just barely higher than the 33.1% of 1996. See for yourself.

5. Marijuana is more potent today than in the past – This myth is the result of bad data. The researchers who made the claim of increased potency used as their baseline the THC content of marijuana seized by police in the early 1970s. Poor storage of this marijuana in un-air conditioned evidence rooms caused it to deteriorate and decline in potency before any chemical assay was performed. Contemporaneous, independent assays of unseized "street" marijuana from the early 1970s showed a potency equivalent to that of modern "street" marijuana. Actually, the most potent form of this drug that was generally available was sold legally in the 1920s and 1930s by the pharmaceutical company Smith-Klein under the name, "American Cannabis".

6. Marijuana is an addictive drug – It is now frequently stated that marijuana is profoundly addicting and that any increase in prevalence of use will lead inevitably to increases in addiction. Essentially all drugs are used in "an addictive fashion" by some people. However, for any drug to be identified as highly addictive, there should be evidence that substantial numbers of users repeatedly fail in their attempts to discontinue use and develop use-patterns that interfere with other life activities. National epidemiological surveys show that the large majority of people who have had experience with marijuana do not become regular users. In 1993, among Americans age 12 and over, about 34% had used marijuana sometime in their life, but only 9% had used it in the past year, 4.3% in the past month, and 2.8% in the past week. A longitudinal study of young adults who had first been surveyed in high school also found a high "discontinuation rate" for marijuana. While 77% had used the drug, 74% of those had NOT used in the past year and 84% had NOT used in the past month. Compare this to a truly addictive drug, such as the nicotine in smoked tobacco with a 90% addiction rate, and the argument for possible marijuana addiction starts to sound very silly.

7. Marijuana damages the reproductive system – This claim is based chiefly on the work of Dr. Gabriel Nahas, who experimented with tissue (cells) isolated in petri dishes, and the work of researchers who dosed animals with near-lethal amounts of cannabinoids (i.e., the intoxicating part of marijuana). Nahas’ generalizations from his petri dishes to human beings have been rejected by the scientific community as being invalid. In the case of the animal experiments, the animals that survived their ordeal returned to normal within 30 days of the end of the experiment. Studies of actual human populations have failed to demonstrate that marijuana adversely affects the reproductive system.

8. Marijuana suppresses the immune system – Like the studies claiming to show damage to the reproductive system, this myth is based on studies where animals were given extremely high — in many cases, near-lethal — doses of cannabinoids. These results have never been duplicated in human beings. Interestingly, two studies done in 1978 and one done in 1988 showed that hashish and marijuana may have actually stimulated the immune system in the people studied.

9. Marijuana smoke contains over a thousand chemicals – True but very misleading. The 31 August 1990 issue of the magazine Science notes that of the over 800 volatile chemicals present in roasted COFFEE, only 21 have actually been tested on animals and 16 of these cause cancer in rodents. Yet, coffee remains legal and is generally considered fairly safe.

10. Marijuana is a drug without therapeutic value – Proposals to make marijuana legally available as a medicine are countered with claims that safer, more effective drugs are available, including a synthetic version of delta-9-THC, marijuana’s primary active ingredient. For thousands of years, throughout the world, people have used marijuana to treat a variety of medical conditions. Today, in the United States, such use is prohibited. Although 36 states have passed legislation to allow marijuana’s use as a medicine, federal law preempts their making marijuana legally available to patients. People undergoing cancer chemotherapy have found smoked marijuana to be an effective anti-nauseant – often more effective than available pharmaceutical medications. Indeed, 44% of oncologists responding to a questionnaire said they had recommended marijuana to their cancer patients; others said they would recommend it if it were legal. Marijuana is also smoked by thousands of AIDS patients to treat the nausea and vomiting associated with both the disease and AZT drug therapy. Because it stimulates appetite, marijuana also counters HIV-related "wasting," allowing AIDS patients to gain weight and prolong their lives.

New Mexico Patients Under Attack!

August 31st, 2007

The DEA is yet again undermining state medical marijuana laws, this time raiding the house of a paraplegic medical marijuana patient in New Mexico and threatening to prosecute him in federal court. While the patient is protected from prosecution under state law, there are no protections for medical marijuana patients under federal law.

 
To make matters worse, federal agencies are blocking the FDA from even considering marijuana’s medical benefits. I urge you to change that. On August 28th agents of the Pecos Valley Drug Task Force in conjunction with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration searched the home of Leonard French, a paraplegic man who lost the use of both of his legs in a motorcycle accident. Mr. French suffers chronic pain and muscle spasms due to a spinal cord injury, and qualified as a medical marijuana patient under the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act state law that passed earlier this year.

Medical marijuana offers him relief with fewer side effects than other pharmaceuticals he’s tried. He is licensed by the New Mexico Department of Health to possess and use marijuana to alleviate his conditions. This is only the DEA’s latest attack on the right of states to take care of their citizens in need. It’s also only the latest scandal to be connected to federally-funded regional narcotics taskforces.

From the wrongful conviction of dozens of people in Tulia, Texas to the harassment of music lovers in Flint, Michigan, these taskforces are at the center of some of our country’s worst civil rights abuses. What You Should Do:

1. Sign Representatives John Olver and Dana Rohrabacher’s Congressional Sign-on letter to DEA in support of Professor Lyle Craker’s application for a Schedule I license to produce research-grade marijuana for FDA-approved clinical studies at the University of Massachusetts. The deadline for signing on is September 7th.

2. Support legislation that protects medical marijuana patients from arrest, and re-direct federal law enforcement resources towards violent drug cartels.

3. Reform the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program and other federal law enforcement grant programs to reduce civil rights abuses and focus local police on violent crime.

Group Suing U.S. Government Over Medical Marijuana Claim

February 21st, 2007

Armed with a new study that showed smoking marijuana eased pain in some HIV patients, medical marijuana advocates sued the federal government Wednesday over its claim that pot has no accepted medical benefits.

The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court by Americans for Safe Access accuses the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services of engaging in "arbitrary and unlawful behavior" that prevents "sick and dying persons from seeking to obtain medicine that could provide them needed, and often lifesaving relief."

The Oakland-based advocacy group wants a judge to force the department and the Food and Drug Administration to stop giving out information that casts doubt on the efficacy of marijuana in treating various illnesses.

"The FDA position on medical cannabis is incorrect, dishonest and a flagrant violation of laws requiring the government to base policy on sound science," Joe Elford, chief counsel for Americans for Safe Access, said in a statement.

California is one of 11 states where marijuana use is legal for people with a doctor’s recommendation, but because the U.S. government does not recognize pot’s medical benefits patients can still be arrested and prosecuted by federal authorities.

MORE 

 

 


Kick Ass